This generally aligns with what I knew about springs vs valving and aligns with everything I have read, spring for weight, valving for feel.stiffer CAN be plusher. At lower pressures in the low 140's the fork was all over the place and kept losing the front and was SUPER harsh.higher pressure the forks smoothed out and was much more controlled. The XACT ACE Robotic System is the world’s first and only comprehensive robotic system that integrates image guided planning and real time monitoring with non-linear steering and precise robotic insertion to deliver various instruments to a desired target in the body during percutaneous procedures, including ablations, biopsies and site-specific drug delivery. I started with 145, went up to 147, back to 143 and this last weekend up to 153.heads and tails more controlled and more plush at 153. Based on my research, 3-5 psi is a 'rate' so that puts the fork in the neighborhood of 149 - 153, so not far off the Racetech but lightyears off what many folks suggest here.
I had to go up to a 4.8 in the back to get my sag number (2 rates) so the thought was I need to go up 2 'effective' rates in the front. My way of originally adjusting fork was basing fork PSI off rear shock spring. Amaranth Audio, Amazing Machines, Amazing Noises,. The Racetech calculator puts me at 155 PSI! Agla software, Agnula, AIbstract, Aida Sound, AIR Music Technology, AirRaid Audio. Not the hardest, not the fastest, but a good representation of difficult old school enduro trails with a bit of everything.mostly 1st - 3rd gear stuff.īike is speced at 143 PSI std for the fork.
We know the pre 21's have a slightly different design, so can't comment directly on those, but do feel like this should apply to all the AER / XACT air forks.īike is a 2021 350 XCF, riding is primarily done in the PNW on tighter, more technical trails. Lots of talk on PSI on these forks and lots of opinions.but just wanted to share some of my experiments and where I ended up.
0 kommentar(er)
